![]() Health Action International |
||
HAI NEWSNumber 112, April/May 2000 HAI News reports on the developments in national and international campaigns for access to essential drugs, rational drug use and formulation and implementation of national health and drug policies. HAI news is published by Action for Rational Drugs in Asia (ARDA), Consumers International Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Editors: Kiran Sagoo & K Bala Layout: Lin Min Min |
||
Contents of this issue |
||
News |
||
EuropeIncreasing transparencyThe European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) announced new plans to increase transparency in its work. Importantly, it wants to publish negative as well as positive decisions about drugs under consideration on the day a decision is reached by the appropriate scientific committee. HAI Europe and the International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB) both responded to the paper and welcomed the agency’s efforts to reduce the secrecy surrounding its decision-making. To receive a copy of the consultation paper and HAI’s response, contact the HAI Europe office or visit its website at: http://www.haiweb.org/news/emeaconsultation.html. |
||
SwedenConference explores consumers’ reactions to medicineThe Consumer Institute for Medicines and Health (KILEN) has announced plans for a meeting designed to increase consumers’ involvement in the reporting of adverse drug effects. EntitledConsumer’s Reports on Medicines, it aims to give participants the tools and inspiration needed to build up national and local reporting systems involving consumers. The conference also aims on establishing a pharmacovigilance system based on consumers’ experiences of drugs, develop a countervailing force to the marketing efforts of the pharmaceutical industry and emphasise pharmaco-vigilance as an indispensable instrument in working for improved public health.
|
The
Drugs and Therapeutics Bulletin will run a training course for bulletin
editors at its offices in central London on 2 - 6, October. The course will
consist of a series of brief talks and practical exercises. Subjects that
will be covered include responsibilities of team members, deciding on topics
of articles, choosing and commissioning external authors, the consultation
process, relating to the media and to government, financial support and
independence. Please see HAI Calendar, p.20 for contact detail. |
|
|
DES (diethylstilbestrol)
is a synthetic estrogen drug that was given to millions of pregnant women
primarily from 1938-1971. Use of DES during pregnancy was thought to prevent
miscarriage and ensure a healthy pregnancy. DES did not work, and women
who took DES and the children they carried are at risk for certain health
problems and may need special care. Find out if you were exposed to DES
and if you were, tell your doctor. More information on DES is available
on the web at: |
|
ASEAN workshop on the TRIPs Agreement and its impact on Pharmaceuticals
|
[Editor’s
note: ASEAN member states: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia,
Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam.] |
|
|
In his opening address, Dr.Georg Petersen, WHO representative to Indonesia, stated that access to drugs represents a very important measure in the quality of health services, and is one of the key indicators of equity and social justice. He stressed that essential drugs are not simple commodities, like any other. Since medicines are traded, the rules governing this trade are crucial. Grim facts were illustrated by Dr.German Velasquez, Coordinator of WHO’s Action Programme on Essential Drugs. In 1999, 10.3 million children under 5 years of age died; 8.6 million of these deaths could have been prevented if essential drugs were affordable. Research shows that the wholesale price of AZT varies nearly six-fold, while the wholesale price of fluconazole varies nearly 40-fold with it being most expensive in Guatemala. For there to be access to medicines, patents granted should benefit the whole society and there should be equity pricing. " Patent laws need to be designed to limit the negative impact of the implications in relation to access to drugs", said Prof. Carlos Correa. A suggestion put forward by James Love, Consumer Project on Technology was for WHO to issue reports which address issues such as legitimate use of patent exceptions and to study the impact of trade agreements on public health.Action for Rational Drugs in Asia (ARDA) Coordinator, Dr K Bala presented a paper outlining consumers’ perspectives on the implications of the TRIPs Agreement on pharmaceuticals. Speaking on the pharmaceutical production capabilities of ASEAN member states, Indonesia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand produce almost all the drugs required, while Malaysia produces about 50 percent of its requirement. However, production in these countries is confined mainly to formulation of dosage forms from imported raw materials. Thus the availability of raw materials at competitive prices in the world market is of critical importance. Under patent protection, finished products and raw material of patented drugs will be marketed at monopoly prices. The pharmaceutical industries in ASEAN and other developing countries are in danger of collapsing. The only remedy will be introducing compulsory licensing and parallel importing in national legislation on patents as provided in the TRIPs Agreement. Among others, participants recommended that national governments should pass patent legislation providing for compulsory licensing and parallel import and include a Bolar provision. An ASEAN expert group on the impact of globalisation and trade liberalisation on the health sector should be established to develop suitable model legislation on patent. ASEAN member countries should adopt a common united stand against any pressure, and safeguard public health interests and access to drugs. Considerable attention was also given to the issue of traditional systems of medicine and indigenous knowledge. Participants recommended that member countries need to develop national legislation, as well as an ASEAN position on the protection of traditional/indigenous knowledge. Member countries should also develop an inventory and registry of their biological resources and traditional knowledge. |
Quote: There is enough for everyone's need but not for everyone's greed. - Gandhi 5th ASEAN Health Ministers' MeetingAt the 5th ASEAN Health Ministers' Meeting held from 28th-29th April in Jakarta, the Ministers adopted a plan of action to address the impact of globalisation/liberalisation on the health sector. Some of the actions are: · Harmonisation of product registration requirements and standards for health products. · Develop strategies to strengthen ASEAN's capacity and competitiveness on health-related products (pharmaceuticals, including traditional medicine and biomedical products, including vaccines) and health services. · Develop a system to monitor the health of vulnerable groups in ASEAN countries · Strengthen collaboration on health research and development with a focus on pharmaceuticals, including traditional medicines and biomedical products, including vaccines. |
|
Helpline on rational use of drugs
|
||
|
ANY NEWS?
|
|
Bolivia
|
||
|
East African Access to Essential Medicines ConferenceDespite improvements in the use of resources, people continue to die form treatable diseases because newer essential drugs remain out of their reach. In poorest areas of East Africa, up to half of the population is without access to basic, essential medicines to treat life threatening and chronic diseases. Medicins Sans Frontieres (MSF) and Health Action International (HAI) will be organising a conference to explore several aspects of the crisis in East Africa. This conference will highlight reasons that make drugs priced beyond the reach of the vast majority of East African and will look at new strategies to dramatically reduce prices and increase access. Please refer to HAI Calendar, p.20 for further details on the conference. |
|
Essential Drug Programme Managers Recognise Importance of Consumers Recognition of the importance of involving consumers in implementing essential drugs programmes (EDPs) was one of the highlights of the third Essential Drug Programme Managers Meeting held in March 2000 in Grabouw, South Africa. Fifty-five participants from 16 countries came together for a week to tackle the issues around implementing the Intensified Essential Drugs Programme to improve access to essential drugs in the African region. EDP managers, chief pharmacists, WHO representatives from EDM and AFRO, NGOs (six, including HAI) and invited guests shared experiences and expertise and helped define priorities for implementation of the programme’s five components: capacity building in drug regulation, achieving better access to essential drugs, improving drug supply, improving rational drug use, information exchange and building institutional capacity. Harmonisation was a key issue in drug regulation discussions. Participants noted that harmonisation is currently driven by industry needs and the trickle down impact of harmonisation negotiations going on among the United States, Japan and Europe, which account for 72 percent of global medicines market. One of the meeting recommendations was that harmonisation should be driven by public health needs rather than the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. Illegal sales of medicines have been identified as a priority area for WHO-AFRO, which is preparing to undertake a study on it. HAI pointed out that current knowledge of illegal sales does not include information about why consumers buy illegal medicines nor adequate information about illegal medicines vendors. It is a priority for HAI Africa to explore ways to address this current gap in information. In achieving better access to essential drugs, direct consumer involvement is vital for success. According to one participant, public pressure is the only way to make governments accountable on access issues. Another noted, 'We need to politicise the essential drugs managers and essentialise the politicians/policymakers.”.' Participants also noted that pricing issues are complex and that more detailed information and understanding are necessary, for example improving easy access to information about pharmaceutical suppliers and prices. WHO supports equity pricing. Pharmaco-therapeutics committees are effective means for improving rational drug use by prescribers and dispensers, and the participants recommended that they be implemented at all levels of care. Improving consumers’ rational drug use is hampered in two ways: (1) a lack of information about consumer drug use behaviours and (2) a tendency in EDPs to see consumers as "targets" rather than as partners in generating information and promoting rational drug use. At the end of the meeting, the EDP managers endorsed the Intensified Essential Drug Programme Implementation Strategy for the African region and made recommendations to WHO and member states concerning each of the main components. The meeting was organised and hosted by the South African Drug Action Programme on behalf of the WHO AFRO regional office. It was an excellent opportunity for HAI partners to make direct contributions to this important meeting and to network. News on Africa contributed by Beryl Leach, HAI Africa Co-ordinator. |
[The recommendations have been posted on E-Drug; the WHO press release about the meeting can be found on www.whoafr.org; and for further information, interested persons can contact S.T. Ajibola, Public Information and Communications Unit, WHO AFRO, ajibolas@whoafr.org]. | |
Uganda Meeting on Trade and Access to Essential Drugs A two-day workshop on the theme, "Advocacy and Campaign for Better Trade, Access to Essential Medicine and Promoting Rational Drug Use in Uganda," was held in Kampala on 17 and 18 February 2000. The workshop was organised and sponsored by Uganda Consumers' Protection Association, Action Aid Uganda, Health Action International and Medecins sans Frontieres. The workshop was a follow up to an earlier meeting in November 1999 to promote networking on rational drug use. The latest meeting attracted participants from national and international NGOs promoting health issues, officials from Ministry of Health, Ministry of Justice, National Drug Authority, Uganda Revenue Authority, other government agencies, pharmacists, businesses, media organisations, and consumers in general. The workshop discussed issues pertaining to access to essential drugs; implications of the World Trade Organization’s Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Properties Rights (TRIPs) on access to drugs; national health and drug policies; trade and medicine laws and irrational use of drugs and cosmetics. Participants generated much discussion and decided to set up an advocacy and campaign for better trade policy, health services and increased consumers’ awareness. Participants agreed that access is a crosscutting issue. They further agreed on the need to network; to create awareness on key issues using various media; to be involved in legislation review and formulation, particularly the draft bill on intellectual property rights; to participate in the current review of the national drug policy; to advocate for infrastructure to, among other things, provide incentives for people to set up drug outlets in rural areas, especially the underprivileged sector; and to promote initiatives to address the important question of access to essential drugs by those who need them. To follow up on these findings and recommen-dations, a committee of six members has been set up to be the core group to undertake the co-ordination, networking and implementation of the Advocacy and Campaign for Better Trade, Access to Essential Medicine and Promotion of Rational Drug Use in Uganda. Contributed by Kimera Henry Richard, Executive Director, Uganda Consumers Protection Association. |
For further information, please contact R. Mutambi, Health and Gender Officer, UCPA, Desai House, Plot 4, Parliament Avenue, PO Box 23783, Kampala, Uganda; Tel: 256 41 234 002; Fax: 234003; email: ucpa@imul.com | |
|
||
|
||
Brazil tightens antibiotics salesThe Brazilian government is to publish legislation to tighten controls over the sale of antibiotics. The legislation will specifically prohibit the sale of all prescription antibiotics without a script and will reclassify ‘red-label’ antibiotics as ‘black-label’. This will require the pharmacist to keep the script when an antibiotic sale is made. Black-label classification is usually reserved for potentially dangerous or addictive drugs, such as psychotropics or barbiturates whose sale is monitored by the authorities. In Brazil, although the majority of antibiotics are classified as ‘red-label’ (prescription-only), they are commonly available over-the-counter (without a prescription) or by re-using a script. Reclassification as black-label will signify to both the pharmacist and the consumer the serious nature of antibiotic use. (SCRIP No. 2510, UK, Feb 2, 2000) |
||
Brazilian generics launches imminent The Brazilian national healthcare monitoring agency (ANVS) is on the point of approving the country’s first generics. The agency has now received more than 100 registration applications and is about to give final approval to between 15 and 20 products. The Ministry of Health is planning a consumer campaign clarifying the definition of a generic to encourage their use. This will accompany the launch of the first generics, reports Folha de Sao Paulo. The national health service is itself expected to be the largest purchaser of generics: it accounts for between 20 per cent and 30 per cent of pharmaceutical sales in Brazil. The generics legislation came into effect in August last year. Legislation approved in November now gives priority registration to generics over branded and copy products. (SCRIP No. 2510, UK, Feb 2, 2000) |
||
|
||
Madrid pharmaceutical companies sent reeling by drug-pricing
policy in Spain
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
The courts - A challenge to health technology assessment Health technology assessment (HTA) draws together information from a variety of sources to provide an evidence-based appraisal of technology. The results of HTA can help to optimise clinical practice as well as to inform health policy and administration on such issues as coverage decisions and regulations. In the past, litigation has been used to challenge clinical practice and health-related administrative decisions, especially in the United States. Court suits brought by industry against researchers constitute a relatively new method to dispute findings and block dissemination of results. Recent developments suggest that this practice may spread internationally to affect assessors of health technologies. The following are two examples: Cholesterol-lowering drugs, Canada The pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers-Squibb Canada Inc. (BMS) sought to prevent release by the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) of a summary report on statins, drugs that lower blood cholesterol. Pharmaceutical companies whose products were analysed had been given the opportunity to review and comment on the draft assessment report; the final version was released in October 1997. In an executive summary meant for policymakers, CCOHTA took the position that all drugs in the class of statins provided benefit (a “class effect”). In its lawsuit, BMS stated that the summary was “negligently misleading” for stating that there was a class effect, as there were adequate clinical trials with only two statin drugs. The court refused to grant an injunction on release of the report, and a higher court denied an appeal of the decision by BMS. Two features of this case raise concerns for the ability of assessors to provide neutral advice. First, although the report was technically competent and reflected the available literature, BMS wanted to prevent conclusions of the research from being made public. Despite suggestions to the contrary in a press release by BMS, such legal action and fear of litigation can impede the free exchange of scientific information. The second disquieting feature is the cost and administrative impact on an HTA agency with limited resources. The money spent by CCOHTA on lawyers to defend its right to publish amounted to 13 per cent of its annual budget. There was also a drain on the limited human resources at CCOHTA. Overall, the case may have substantially impaired other HTA activities at the agency. In a similar case, a drug company (Merck) tried through court proceedings to stop distribution of a newsletter from the Norwegian Medicines Control authority containing a critical evaluation of Fosamax, an osteoporosis drug. Although the judge was critical of the newsletter’s content, he felt that the Authority should be free to publish its view. Licensing documentation for a contraceptive, Finland Norplant is a contraceptive method based on slow-release levonorgesterel capsules. Norplant had been controversial because of doubts concerning its safety and its suitability for developing countries. Two Finnish researchers wanted to study the documentation for Norplant’s licensing in Finland in 1983. Licensing data were made available for research through special permission by the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (MOH) and a report was written by 1996. The study showed that the 1983 release of Norplant was premature by current standards; the evidence now usually required for licensing new drugs was not then available. However, most of these results have remained unpublished because of legal action taken by Leiras, the producer of the drug. After seeing the manuscript (provided by MOH), Leiras sued MOH for having released confidential data. It took 2 years for the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland to decide that the case did not have legal merit. Before taking the case to court, the drug company advised MOH that, if the article were to by published, MOH and the researchers would be “responsible for economic harm resulting to the company”. A salary-based researcher could not pay compensation even for a small decline in the sales of Norplant. Either compensation would have been paid by the employer, or the financial threat was intended only to make researchers give up publication of their research. The legal challenge may affect future decisions of the MOH on whether torelease confidential information for research. (Science, vol. 285, Jul 9, 99) |
[Editors note: See 'Increasing transparency' or HAI’s work on secrecy.] | |
Long-term strategy needed to treat AIDS in poor countries Tireless effort by the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) has lead to Pfizer
agreeing to supply Diflucan (fluconazole) to all AIDS patients in South
Africa, suffering from crypotococcal meningitis, who are unable to afford
the drug. TAC welcomed Pfizer's step and agreed that distribution should
take place on the basis of clear medical guidelines and clinical indications. "For the vast majority of the 32 million people with HIV/AIDS
in developing countries, Pfizer's action will have no impact," continued
Dr Pecoul. MSF is calling on pharmaceutical companies to use mechanisms other than charity to make life-saving drugs available to people in poor countries. This could be done most effectively by lowering prices to affordable levels - through tiered pricing - or by issuing voluntary licenses that would allow for the importation or production of generic versions of treatments. "We're delighted that at least one step has been made toward providing treatments for AIDS patients - but is it a sustainable option?" stated Chris Ouma, a physician who works with Doctors Without Borders at Mbagathi Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. "We're very happy for the South Africans, but for me, as a Kenyan doctor, and for the Kenyan patients dying from cryptoccocal meningitis, it doesn't help much." In Kenya, where Pfizer continues to hold the patent on fluconazole, the drug remains prohibitively priced and the majority of patients diagnosed with cryptoccocal meningitis die without treatment. |
Pfizer takes the Australian PBS to courtsPfizer Pty. Ltd. took the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Committee to the Federal Court in 1999 after the committee recommended against Viagra being listed on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. On March 20, 2000 the Federal Court dismissed the application for a review of this decision and awarded costs against Pfizer. Justice Jane Mathews found that none of the grounds of complaints had been substantiated and the PBS Committee was not restricted to considering only medical issues as Pfizer had argued. The Federal Health Minister, Dr Wooldridge, was reported to be delighted with the news. Mr Alan Brindell, Pfizer, said the decision was "barbaric" and deprived poorer men of access to the latest health innovation. (Source: E-drug correspondence) |
|
|
||
· Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries, The TRIPs Agreement and Policy Options, by Carlos M Correa, published in association with Third World Network, Penang, Malaysia, Dec 99, 254 pp. The Agreement on Trade Related Intellectual Property rights (TRIPs) has massive implications for developing countries particularly with regard to research and development, access to advanced technology and commercial exploitation of their natural resources. The Agreement has a negative impact on access to essential drugs in developing countries. There is a strong pressure on developing countries to implement the agreement through national legislation. But unfortunately very few people can understand the Agreement which is a complex legal document. This book, by Prof Correa, will enable everyone to easily understand what TRIPs is about; the main provisions are explained in simple language. He has also examined the important area of the conservation and sustainable utilisation of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in relation to how access to such resources for research and breeding may be affected by the granting of patent protection. Prof. Correa has indicated concrete options available to implement the provisions of the TRIPs Agreement in a manner consistent with development objectives and public policy concerns. This book is a good introduction to TRIPs and provides guidelines to develop policies and laws on intellectual property from a developing country perspective. Available from: Third World Network, 228 Macalister Road, 10400 Penang, Malaysia. |
||
|
Irrational prescribing in Nepal as in other countries is a problem. Traditional undergraduate teaching does not train the medical students adequately for therapeutics. Continuing medical education (CME) on rational therapeutics is not available in a systematic and organised manner in Nepal as in several developing countries. In order to equip new graduates with necessary skills to prescribe rationally, a three-day problem-oriented training programme was conducted by the Medical Education Department of the Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Nepal. Twelve topics of immediate relevance to practising clinicians were taken up by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians. More than 30 clinical cases were discussed; some of them real and others simulated. There was substantial improvement in the scoring by participants for many of the questions asked in the post-test as compared in the pre-test. Participants’ evaluation of the programme, carried out anonymously, showed that it was rated very highly by them. The 16 multiple choice questions given pre- and post-test as well as an analysis of the evaluations by the 29 participants are included in the document. These will be particularly useful to other medical educators who wish to plan similar problem-oriented training programmes. Senior medical undergraduate students and new medical graduates will find this report useful. Available from: Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal. |
WHO
has recently launched the WHO Anti-microbial Resistance Information Bank
(AR Bank) which can be accessed at: http://oms.b3e.jussieu.fr/arinfobank/ |
|
|
Healthcare is multifaceted and involves several groups of people. Lay persons/readers want to know what may happen when they seek healthcare; a woman should be aware of potential gender related risks in hospitals and how to avoid sexual harassment; healthcare professionals need to know how the general public view the present health crisis and how to avoid litigations; healthcare administrators have to understand the complex-nature of healthcare related problems in their countries and health activists should have a very clear understanding of the various aspects of the multifaceted system to enable them to inform and educate the public and to campaign and lobby for an affordable and accessible healthcare system in their countries. This book provides relevant information to the various key-players and underscores the importance of all these key-players, working and collaborating together, to formulate a national health policy to make health for all a reality. A well-known clinical pharmacologist once advised his students that every time a patient was given a drug, it was the beginning of a new experiment and, therefore, should be carefully followed and noted down. Sethuraman believes that every patient has a story to tell and every “case” was a lesson to learn from. This he has done for over 30 years and this book is the result. Everyone likes stories; Aesop’s fables, Remus tales and Pancha-thantra stories are very well-known as tools to educate children as well as adults. Sethuraman has selected relevant stories to illustrate and introduce sometimes complex clinical episodes and interspaced them with interesting graphics to enable lay-readers and health activists to understand and be educated on the multifaceted healthcare. The two appendices provide further empowerment to the public. The first appendix is an extract of a letter from the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare guaranteeing every person adequate emergency care. The second is a model citizen’s charter for government hospitals. Trick or Treat is enjoyable reading as well as an educational tool for all the key-players involved in healthcare. Available from: Society of EQUIP, P.B. No. 8, D-Nagar P.O., Pondicherry 605 006, India. Email: |
Subscribe
to HIV/AIDS Newsletter for Developing Countries, Satellife will be starting
an email-based HIV/AIDS newsletter for health professionals in the developing
world, especially in Africa. The newsletter will be a supplement to HealthNet
News, a weekly publication we currently distribute to health professionals
in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Healthnet News-AIDS, published twice
a month, will feature literature summaries of articles, abstracts, full
text articles, clinical guidelines, websites, and other relevant information.
Health professionals who live and work in the developing world, particularly
Africa, may subscribe to the newsletter. Satellife has been granted permission
by several medical publishers to use copyrighted journal information in
this newsletter for distribution in the developing world only. How to subscribe
You may subscribe to this free newsletter by sending an email message to:
majordomo@usa.healthnet.org
Type the following command in the body of your message: subscribe hnn-aids |
|
|
Are healthcare consumers hooked on too much medicine? Are doctors pressured to provide a cure for every illness, regardless of proven effectiveness? Are they even pressured to promote illnesses by drug companies and the healthcare systems themselves? In this book, Australian reporter Ray Moynihan reveals that in too many cases the answer to these questions is yes. From Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) to lower back operations to radiation from x-rays, Moynihan found that doctors often prescribe tests and cures based on flimsy scientific evidence, sometimes with disastrous results. In part one, the book runs through a litany of drugs, surgeries, tests and devices that have had questionable, even harmful results. In fact, according to the book, one in six people is admitted to the hospital for an injury caused by the healthcare system itself. Part two examines the pressures on doctors that lead to these dangerous prescriptions. The last part briefly discusses a worldwide movement toward an ‘evidence-based’ approach in medicine, enabling doctors and patients to avoid commercial pressures and more often base their decisions on the best available scientific evidence. The book has provided the basis for a television series produced by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Network and is an excellent resource for healthcare consumers concerned about the risks involved in today’s medicine. Available from: ABC Books, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, GPO Box 9994, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia. |
CONSUMER REPORTS ON MEDICINE: THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCESigtuna, Sweden 29 September - 1 October 2000 Contact: Lena Westin, KILEN, Kammakargatan 7, S-111 40, Sweden Tel: +46 8 696 0100 Fax: +46 8 6960110 kilen@kilen-institutet.se IMPROVING ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL MEDICINES IN EAST AFRICA, PATENTS AND PRICES IN A GLOBAL ECONOMYNairobi, Kenya
15-16 June 2000 Contact: Access Conference Secretariat, MSF Nairobi Office,
P.O. Box 38897, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: + 254 2 572094, 570021, 570025 (ext
107) Fax: + 254 2 572157 |
|
|
Since its introduction, Norplant, an implantable contraceptive, has been controversial. Questions have arisen over whether Norplant can be inserted and removed safely, whether there is adequate documentation about its side effects, and the coercion of women in developing countries to use Norplant. Finnish researcher Eeva Ollila’s doctoral thesis, now a published report, examines the population and drug policies surrounding Norplant as well as issues linked to the introduction and use of the drug in developing countries. Norplant is manufactured in Finland, the first country to authorise Norplant’s use. Ollila found that trade secrecy has made it difficult for the public to obtain information about decisions regarding the drug’s authorisation in that country. This is particularly important when considering use in developing countries, says Ollila, where drug approval is based largely on whether the drug is approved in the country of manufacture. According to Ollila, who examined case studies in India, safe use of Norplant can be compromised by weaknesses in service provision. In countries with strong population control policies, there is a risk of coercive use of Norplant. The report is a well-researched technical examination of these issues, aimed at an audience familiar with Norplant, not the general public. Available from: STAKES, PO Box 220/Publications, SF-00531 Helsinki, Finland. Fax: 358-9-396 72450. |
TRAINING COURSE FOR BULLETIN EDITORSLondon, United Kingdom 2- 6 October 2000 Contact: Andrea Tarr, Drug and Therapeutic Bulletin, 2 Marylebone Road, London, NW1 4DF, United Kingdom Fax: + 44 171 830 7665 tarran@which.co.uk 16TH CONSUMERS INTERNATIONAL WORLD CONGRESSDurban, South Africa 13 - 17 November 2000 Contact: Dina Musante Durazno 1315, CP 11100, Montevideo, Uruguay Tel: + (598 2) 901 5415 / 901 8081 Fax: + (598 2) 901 8082 dmusante@internet.com.my |
|
| · Corporate Predators: The Hunt for Megaprofits and the Attack on Democracy, by Robert Weissman and Russell Mokhiber, Common Courage Press, US$11.21 plus shipping costs, 213 pp. US-based corporate accountability experts Robert Weissman and Russell Mokhiber have written a new book about the costs of living in a corporate-dominated society: the growing wealth disparity around the world, pollution, rampant corporate crime, the decline of democracy, and, of course, the costs to our health. While not focused specifically on corporate influence on medicine and healthcare, one can easily extrapolate the book’s message: We, indeed, have much to fear from the increasing role of corporations in our society, from mergers that consolidate power to corporate influence on government policies to big business sponsorship of our environment, education, and healthcare. This book is a call to action for anyone concerned about corporate power in today’s world. Available from: Common Courage Press, PO Box 702, Monroe, Maine 04951, USA. It can also be ordered from the web at: |
PEOPLE'S HEALTH
ASSEMBLY
|
|
|
Health Action International (HAI) is an informal network of individuals and NGOs working towards ensuring the availability of and rational use of medicines. Website: http://www.haiweb.org HAI Coordinating Offices: ARDA HAI Europe AIS Latin America HAI Africa c/o HAI-Europe, Articles in HAI New may be reproduced for non-profit use. Please clearly credit HAI News as the source and send us a copy of the article. |
||
|
Press Release HAI supports developing countries’ demand for greater WHO involvement in the fight against HIV/AIDS. A large coalition of developing countries led a successful effort to increase the World Health Organization’s (WHO) role in advising countries about best treatment options for HIV/AIDS and ways to reduce barriers affecting drug pricing and access at the 53rd World Health Assembly (WHA), May 2000, Geneva, Switzerland. A group of developing countries, led by Brazil and Zimbabwe, pushed to broaden WHO’s field of activities related to HIV/AIDS despite strong opposition from many developed countries, including the United States and some members of the European Union. "Developing countries made it clear at the Assembly this year that they were not going to back down to Northern pressures on this issue," said Bas van der Heide, coordinator of HAI Europe. "WHO's involvement in identifying ways to improve affordability and access must now live up to developing countries' expectations and needs." A resolution on HIV/AIDS adopted at the WHA calls on the WHO to expand its current databases to include information on the prices of many crucial medicines, including HIV/AIDS drugs. The resolution’s clear language on drug pricing caused tension during the Assembly in light of countries’ mixed response to an earlier announcement by UNAIDS that five drug companies planned to consider price reductions on selected HIV/AIDS medicines in some countries. HAI believes such efforts are only short-term solutions that will have little impact on getting needed drugs to the poorest people. This is the first time the WHO has been urged to look at the crucial issue of drug pricing,” said Van der Heide. "With that information in hand, countries can assess industry offers and can use hard-won legal options to find and negotiate the best prices for the drugs they need.”"At the Assembly, developing countries also urged the WHO to play an active role in advising countries on the public health implications of international trade agreements. During a discussion on the Revised Drug Strategy, numerous countries urged the WHO to guard its independent voice when giving countries’ advice on health-related aspects of trade after some developed countries led by the US signalled they would support an initiative that would force the WHO to clear any advice on trade issues with other international organisations including the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). In the HIV/AIDS resolution and in their formal remarks, developing country representatives also emphasised the need to encourage local manufacturing, greater use of generic drugs and legal import practices-all means to bring down prices and help improve access to essential drugs. |